M. E. Bennett, R. Hirschi, M. Pignatari, S. Diehl, C. Fryer, F. Herwig, A. Hungerford, K. Nomoto, G. Rockefeller, F. X. Timmes, M. Wiescher
[Shortened] The 12C + 12C fusion reaction has been the subject of
considerable experimental efforts to constrain uncertainties at temperatures
relevant for stellar nucleosynthesis. In order to investigate the effect of an
enhanced carbon burning rate on massive star structure and nucleosynthesis, new
stellar evolution models and their yields are presented exploring the impact of
three different 12C + 12C reaction rates. Non-rotating stellar models were
generated using the Geneva Stellar Evolution Code and were later post-processed
with the NuGrid Multi-zone Post-Processing Network tool. The enhanced rate
causes core carbon burning to be ignited more promptly and at lower
temperature. This reduces the neutrino losses, which increases the core carbon
burning lifetime. An increased carbon burning rate also increases the upper
initial mass limit for which a star exhibits a convective carbon core. Carbon
shell burning is also affected, with fewer convective-shell episodes and
convection zones that tend to be larger in mass. Consequently, the chance of an
overlap between the ashes of carbon core burning and the following carbon shell
convection zones is increased, which can cause a portion of the ashes of carbon
core burning to be included in the carbon shell. Therefore, during the
supernova explosion, the ejecta will be enriched by s-process nuclides
synthesized from the carbon core s process. The yields were used to estimate
the weak s-process component in order to compare with the solar system
abundance distribution. The enhanced rate models were found to produce a
significant proportion of Kr, Sr, Y, Zr, Mo, Ru, Pd and Cd in the weak
component, which is primarily the signature of the carbon-core s process.
Consequently, it is shown that the production of isotopes in the Kr-Sr region
can be used to constrain the 12C + 12C rate using the current branching ratio
for a- and p-exit channels.
View original:
http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.1225
No comments:
Post a Comment